You Were Duped
March 22, 2007By Warren Curry
If you’re like me, then last fall you were eagerly anticipating the December release of “Rocky Balboa.” If you’re like the rest of the sane world, then the mere thought of the film caused you to react with an uncomfortable mix of nervous laughter and hushed horror. When the movie hit American screens last December 20, it was largely met with positive reviews from critics, many who admitted that “Rocky Balboa” was perhaps the film they were least looking forward to viewing during the busy holiday season. Surprising, huh? No, not really.
Though it’s just a theory, with little evidence to support it, I’m convinced most “Rocky Balboa” proponents are not genuine fans of the film. My feeling is that the majority of these people really only appreciate the spirit and effort Sylvester Stallone put into making the franchise come full circle. It’s a bold claim, and maybe not an entirely valid one (I’m like Dr. Phil that way), so let me attempt to dig myself out of this hole.
Starting with “Rocky III” (my personal favorite chapter in the series), Stallone made the decision to turn the story of the scrappy, underdog boxer into a cartoon. Rocky stopped being the everyman and vaulted into the stratosphere of superhero. He saved the world from a badass bully with a mohawk (Clubber Lang), a cheating, steroid injecting Russian gargantuan (Ivan Drago), a crooked promoter (George Washington Duke) and a young pugilist corrupted by fame and greed (Tommy “Machine” Gunn). But when “Rocky V” hit theaters, the general public, much like Tommy Gunn, turned their back on Rocky. The film grossed a disappointing $40 million at the box office, a staggering decline from the previous two installments, which each raked in well over $100 million.
In many ways, the ’80s weren’t kind to Rocky Balboa, the character. Sure, he triumphed at the end of every movie, but his ego became appallingly bloated. The money, the popularity, it all went straight to his head, and the result was a character you rooted for only because his adversaries were so much more dislikeable. (I can’t be the only person who hoped Apollo’s punch landed first in the freeze frame punctuated sparring session at the end of “Rocky III.”) Face it, this was another obscenely self-absorbed athlete in dire need of his comeuppance.
Who received the comeuppance, it turned out, was Stallone. The 1990s brought about a relatively seismic shift in pop culture, and it wasn’t long before many of us were laughing at the excesses we so revered the previous decade. By the latter half of the ’90s, Stallone was viewed as a humorous relic from a distant time, much like the way we all snickered at bell bottoms in 1985. Gone were the days of Rocky and Rambo, now it was “Judge Dredd” and “Daylight.” After winning some critical accolades for his “serious” performance in the kind of, sort of, but not really all that good “Cop Land,” the aging actor was relegated to roles in a string of inconsequential movies (”Driven,” “Avenging Angelo,” “Shade”).
Stallone obviously saw his window of opportunity closing. He was an actor who couldn’t escape his past, so instead of trying to run from it, he embraced it. If he was always going to be thought of as Rocky or Rambo, then why not give the people what they want (”John Rambo” — notice a theme? — is currently in production)? Stallone claimed he wasn’t happy with the way “Rocky V” turned out (I wonder why?) and wanted a better conclusion to the series. If that was his one goal, then “Rocky Balboa” is a success.
My feeling is that goal was also the only demand of critics and the public. Set expectations low enough and just about anything (except “Basic Instinct II”) will exceed them. When I saw the film, I remember thinking it was a nice try, but that it lacked too much in the way of storytelling skill to truly work. As someone who wanted to like the movie, I was almost sad that I wouldn’t be able to defend it against the critical beating I was sure it would receive. But then the strong reviews came pouring in, and soon people who had openly poked fun at me for my interest in the film were proudly supporting it. I anticipated being on one side of the “Rocky Balboa” argument, but found myself completely in the other corner.
I hope fans of the film can at least admit it’s absurd. Of course, Rocky III-V were fantastically more absurd, but that was the point of those movies. They were connected to reality by only the loosest thread and made no bones about that fact. “Rocky Balboa” attempts to be the same kind of gritty, feel-good entertainment as the original “Rocky,” but still exists in a fantasy world. Aside from some guy on the Internet named Warren Curry’s sharp review (click here to read), I’m not sure if any other critic pointed out how preposterous a key story beat in this film is.
The climactic “exhibition” fight between Rocky, who’s coming out of a long retirement, and the film’s ostensible villain, current heavyweight champion Mason “The Line” Dixon (played by former light heavyweight champ Antonio Tarver), is set up by Dixon’s management team so their fighter can obtain the public’s much needed respect. Whaaaat??? This would be the equivalent of Floyd Mayweather’s manager deciding that a match against Sugar Ray Leonard would be a way to earn his fighter credibility. In reality, Mayweather would be mercilessly ridiculed and rightfully torn to shreds by the boxing media if this happened. Since you’re probably not a boxing fan, and are currently asking yourself “Floyd Who?,” here’s another sports analogy.
Let’s imagine, like Dan Tester does, the Chicago Bears won the most recent Super Bowl. They’re regarded as one of the weaker Super Bowl champs in NFL history, and after ESPN airs the result of a video game, which shows the 2006 Bears going down to defeat against the 1985 Bears, Chicago coach Lovie Smith calls an emergency team meeting. He informs his players that the only way to gain the respect of football fans is to face the ‘85 team in a game of two-hand touch. Never mind that Walter Payton is dead and Refrigerator Perry could succumb to a heart attack walking off the team bus. No, if Brian Urlacher and crew wish to be considered a gutty football squad, they have to put an end to the Super Bowl Shuffle. I’m sure a better writer could work in a “Footloose” reference here.
Getting back to “Rocky Balboa,” let’s consider the fight itself. Any professional referee interested in keeping his job would stop the bout when Rocky gets knocked down in the first round. And how about the judges’ literally impossible scorecards? Before you say, “it’s just a movie!” can you imagine if a football film depicted scene after scene of two teams scoring touchdowns, only to reveal the game’s final score is 7-3? I find it impossible to believe anyone would excuse such inattention to detail. Being a big boxing fan, it’s possible I’m overly defensive, but it seems Stallone always finds a way to make a mockery of the sport. Toss in a few cheaply vulnerable moments when Rocky pines for the late Adrian, an especially despicable Paulie (Burt Young), a strangely uncomfortable scene where Rock is dissed by some young troublemakers in a bar, a surrogate son character who is sloppily abandoned halfway through the film, and I maintain that you have to give this movie EVERY benefit of the doubt to be a fan.
If you didn’t see this film in the theater, you may or may not be interested to know it was released on DVD this week. It’s supposed to have some solid bonus features and an alternate ending (if you’ve seen the DVD, feel free to share this ending in the comments section). As you might have guessed, I won’t be adding “Rocky Balboa” to my collection. To bring this blog to a rushed, unnatural conclusion, let me say, in summation, it’s not that I feel you’re wrong for being a “Rocky Balboa” fan. It’s simply that I don’t believe you.