A Doc on Doc

by Memo Salazar

young Doc, old Doc

I’ve been a “New Yorker” going on six years now. Before then, New York was just a big city to me, and New Yorkers were these creatures who had convinced themselves that they could never live anywhere else, because they had already discovered the Greatest Place On Earth. Yawn, I thought, who wants to live with such snobs? Next thing I knew, I found myself here, among the rich and the insane, and quickly discovered that those New Yorkers were kind of right- this is a city that never stops giving. There’s always something new to discover, something waiting for you to learn, and someone fascinating for you to bump into. I’ve lived in bigger cities, but, despite its overpriced real estate, its annoyingly rich patrons and its occasional pretensions, New York gets under your skin in a good way.

H.L. “Doc” Humes was a New Yorker, too. Other than being remotely familiar with the name, I had no idea who this guy was, or why I should care to watch a full-length documentary on the man. But I did, anyway; Doc, lovingly made by Humes’ daughter, Immy, is both a riveting tale of one of the most fascinating people I’ve ever heard of, and a tribute to a father by a daughter who clearly loved him, despite the difficult and challenging life he crafted for himself. As with My Architect and Tell Them Who You Are, this “first-person” portrait of an influential creative person from the point of view of the subject’s offspring provides an intimacy (and access to some wonderful interviews) no one else could achieve. Doc is different than those other films in that it’s really not about the parent/subject - child/filmmaker relationship, but rather a simple, chronological biography of Humes. Nothing flashy, nothing clever- which is just perfect, as there is so much substance to the story, a straightforward approach is just what the doc… er… doctor ordered. Immy Humes wisely lets her father’s peers, and not the editing room, do the talking.

And what a list of peers! Interviewed are such fascinating figures as Norman Mailer, George Plimpton, Tim Leary, and Paul Auster, not to mention Hume’s own family and illegitimate offspring- all in all, a really diverse group of human beings. And that’s what the film is really about- one of the most dynamic human beings to emerge out of our 20th Century culture, a man so full of energy and creativity that his mind had clearly left his psychological and emotional selves far behind. Humes wrote 2 acclaimed novels, shot an independent film, hung out with great artists like Ornette Coleman and Richard Wright, founded one of the most influential literary journals (The Paris Review), designed and built low-cost paper houses as aid to third-world countries, experimented with LSD way before it was considered “cool”, was an avid supporter of the legalization of cannabis, communicated with clouds, hung out on college campuses dispensing words of wisdom as well as thousands of dollars in cash to whomever happened to come by… I mean, this guy clearly had a restless soul, one that hungered for whatever challenge life could throw at it. As is often the case, one’s devotion to such a lifestyle doesn’t jive well with structure, whether the societal structure of jobs and the law (being arrested for protesting a citywide ban on folk music is one of his several inspiring arrests) or the interpersonal structure of a family. Doc clearly loved his children, but his mental state was simply not the ideal one to be in while fulfilling the role of father. Even so, Doc is a dignified portrait which never dips into the easy button-pushing of scandal and daytime-TV faire; the film doesn’t shy away from detailing his darkest moments, but it doesn’t linger or milk the story for dramatic effect. Yes, he was paranoid, but yes, he had every reason to be- Doc does a wonderful job of bringing the viewer around to see the world through Doc’s eyes, so that, by the end, you really feel like you, too spent time with the guy, shooting the shit every day in Harvard Square for hours. I actually do have vague memories of seeing a man very much like him hanging around that area in the late 80’s while I hunted used records… though, perhaps, it’s just wishful thinking. Even in death, Doc’s magnetic personality is in full effect.

Doc is, ultimately, a story of redemption- for Doc, after a lifetime of stubborn self-fulfilment, spends his last few years with the people he loves the most, developing relationships that had been put on pause decades earlier. The fact that his own daughter- someone who could have resented him the most for his negligent role as a father during her childhood- had, at this stage in his life, the presence of mind to be lovingly celebrating his final few years of life by way of a video camera is evidence of Doc’s powerful and positive influence on the people around him. Though his body was on its way out, his mind was as sharp as ever, providing one of Doc’s best lines in the film, when he insightfully proclaimed that you never really stop loving people- after all the anger and animosity recedes, the love is still there, waiting for you to pick up where you’d left off. It’s as much a statement about himself as it is about the amazing collection of people Doc had gathered across the decades and continents of his journey, all of whom speak of the man with a combination of admiration and compassion- a testament to Doc’s mind as well as his heart.

I have no idea where or when you’ll be able to see Doc, but the film’s website might be of service in that regard. Check it out, as it’s definitely worth your time.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “A Doc on Doc”

  1. Dan Tester Says:

    Nice article, Memo.

    I like movies like this.

    I will look forward to seeing it in 2022…when it arrives here in bumfuck.

    And I just want a little credit here, for staying “on topic” while in feedback mode…

  2. Mr. Warren Says:

    Sounds like an interesting one. And I’m sure it’ll be available on Netflix before 2022, Dan.

    Tell Them Who You Are! I had forgotten about that great doc, so thanks for the reminder.

    Memo, I’ll guess you went used record hunting at Mystery Train, In Your Ear, Second Coming and…what was that other store??? On Mass. Ave, same side of the street as Second Coming, but a bit closer to Central Square. I really liked the In Your Ear on Commonwealth Ave. too.

    Ahhh, the good ‘ol days…

  3. cinemaspeak Says:

    Yes, what was that other store? Revolution Records? Don’t forget my favorite one of all, which is still operating- Cheapo Records, in Central Square itself- they’ve moved closer to the Middle East. I still have yet to find a string of quality record stores so close together..!

    And, Dan, by 2022, all you’ll have to do is wiggle your ear and “Doc” can be streamed into your mind directly- no need for clunky dvd players and retinas. All for one low monthly price, of course…

  4. Dan Tester Says:

    Jesus H. Tapdancing Christ…I try to stay “on topic” during feedback mode for once in my life, and you two start talking about record stores in Gotham?

    I will no longer feel guilt, nor shame, for taking things “off topic” while in feedback mode. Taking things “off topic” was just a hobby of mine in the past. Believe me, long before the internet existed, I thrived on driving discussions “off-topic”.

    I remember one time, I was interviewing Mother Theresa about the homeless plight in Calcutta, and I got bored, and asked her which Jackson brother was her favorite. She quickly said “Michael”, and I said “Oh come on Mama T, that was too easy. Which is your favorite brother other than Michael???”.

    She squirmed a bit, and then said she would not answer such a baited question. But I would not relent. I continued to ask her who her favorite Jackson brother was, besides Michael. At one point, she threw her nachos at me, and said I was out of line, and that this was not supposed to be part of the interview anyway.

    Again, I relented, and said I would give her twenty bucks for the children of Calcutta if she answered honestly.

    At first, Mother Theresa balked, and her people told me that this interview was OVER, and she began to leave the room. But I fluttered the twenty dollars in front of her face, and she suddenly threw her hands up in the air, in utter despair, and screamed “TITO!! TITO!! TITO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

    And then, Mother Theresa collapsed in a heap of frustration. I felt sad, really, that I had brought out the truth from that goofy old broad from Calcutta, and had caused her such dismay . But I also felt a bit of bravado as well. So, as any gentleman would do, I tossed the twenty bucks onto her quivering ass, and left the room.

    Her people told me I was an asshole.

  5. the memster Says:

    Throwing money at old ladies that try to help the world is definitely not cool, especially when it’s so off-topic. I can’t believe you didn’t get a good can of whoop-ass lodged at you. I believe Warren’s question was markedly “on-topic” if it directly related to something found in the review- namely, used record stores (not in Gotham, but in Harvard Square).

    And, Warren, I believe the cd shop in question was called LOONEY TUNES.

    Thanks for letting me set the record straight.

  6. Dan Tester Says:

    Memo, I will admit I was wrong.

    I guess Warren was not “off-topic” at all. I had forgotten the record store reference in your blog.

    This is particularly upsetting to me because, you see, I am an “off-topic” connoisseur. I get a pure adrenaline rush from the prospect of “off-topic” discussion. I feed on it. It feeds me. I can’t explain it any other way.

    So, in respect to this thread, and in respect to the internet in general, I will simply bow out of this discussion.

    Yes, yes, I was about to also describe the time I interviewed Pat Robertson, and it all devolved into a hideous fiasco in which Pat called me a “sumbitch Godless prick” and I threw Ho-Hos at his wife Kiki…but I will just let it go…but the way that the Ho-Ho’s were introduced into the confrontation would have been the magical “hook” that makes for great reading, the hook that Ernest Hemingway once referred to as “The Hook”…

    Oh well…for another time…another…………..time

Leave a Reply